Unfortunately, the patentability requirements are frequently misunderstood. For many who are not well versed in patent law one of the reasons it can be confusing when considering patentability is due to the fact that the first of the patentability requ…Continue Reading ...
ご存知の方も多いかもしれませんが、日本特許庁のウェブサイト(正確には特許情報プラットフォーム：J-Plat Pat)において、「ワン・ポータル・ドシエ（ＯＰＤ）照会」というサービスが利用できます。下記のリンク先↓https://www10.j-platpat.inpit.go.jp/pop/all/popd/POPD_GM101_Top.action このシステムを使えば、文献番号から世界各国の特許庁が保有する出願・審査関連情報(ドシエ情報)を照会できる。 例えば、日本出願の出Continue Reading ...
Facebook is not the only company seeking to provide content to consumers via their own Internet-based platforms. In early May, the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) announced a deal with San Francisco-based social media firm Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) to livestream 20 games per year over multiple seasons on the social media platform. The first WNBA game livestreamed on Twitter on Sunday, May 14th, earned 1.1 million viewers, nearly one-third the average audience watching National Football…
Continue Reading ...
$$ The drive shaft may be attachable to the receptacle and cutting surface. / 駆動軸は、容器及び切削面に取り付け可能とすることができる。(USP8956358)
$$ Audio apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the housing is attachable to eyewear. / 前記ハウジングが眼鏡類に取り付け可能であることを特徴とする請求項１に記載のオーディオ装置。(USP8842870)
$$ The base and the lid may also be attachable to each other by a re-usable non-permanent adhesive. / 基部と蓋は、互いに繰り返し使用可能な非永久接着剤で互いに取り付け可能である。(USP8567597)
$$ Preferably, said sheath remover is removably attachable to said syringe housing in use, for storage. / 好ましくは、シース除去機構は、保管用に、使用中のシリンジ・ハウジングに対して着脱可能である。(USP8337472)
$$ Preferably, the pump has a pump nozzle, the pump nozzle being attachable to a pipette tip. / 好ましくは、ポンプはポンプノズルを有し、該ポンプノズルはピペットチップに取り付け可能である。(USP8101137)
$$ As set forth in FIG. 12, the mirror 100 includes a bracket 102, which is attachable to a vehicle. (USP7114817)
$$ FIG. 2 is a cross section through a stabilising device which is adapted to be removeably attachable to the lubricator shown in FIG. 1; (USP6554808)
$$ The display window area 22 is defined by a front cover or surround (not shown) attachable to the housing 10. (USP6427750)
$$ The appliance comprises a housing 10 attachable by a bracket (not shown) to a wall and containing a tungsten halogen TH lamp 11 behind a transparent lens 12, and a low energy PL lamp 13 behind a translucent lens 14. (USP6276814)
$$ The second referred embodiment of the brewing acoaratus of the invention differs from the first preferred embodiment in the manner in which the brewing assembly is attachable to the upper platform top 24 of the upper platform 9. (USP6250208)
$$ FIG. 7 illustrates the printer 24 with a sealing lid or dust cover 300 attachable to the printer 24 to close the print face 11 in the base of the printer. (USP01024586)
目次はこちらContinue Reading ...
Those of you in the D.C. area might want to mark your calendars for next Thursday. The Federal Circuit will be hearing oral argument in one of its panel-stacking cases, Nidec Motor Corporation v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co. I will try to post the briefs and more about the appeal in a future post.
Panel […]Continue Reading ...
Authors: Kate Leonard* Editor: Caitlin O’Connell & Lily Robinson Monday, June 5, 2017 In Re NFC Technology, No. 16-1808, Courtroom 201 In this appeal from the PTAB, the Federal Circuit will address whether the Board exceeded its authority in an inter partes review by sua sponte raising a conception/lack of inurement defense on behalf of Petitioner HTC. Patent […]Continue Reading ...
The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to deny the trademark cancellation petition, finding that the Board used an incorrect standard for “fame” in its likelihood of confusion analysis… The Court rejected the Board’s all-or-nothing analysis, holding that it must consider all of the relevant confusion factors, on a scale appropriate to their merits, under the totality of the circumstances. It explained that the proper legal standard for…
Continue Reading ...
As discussed recently on the EPLaw Blog, in late April Judge Richard Hacon (Intellectual Property Enterprise Court for England & Wales) handed down an opinion in OOO Abbott v. Design & Display, a case involving an award of the defendant’s profi…Continue Reading ...